Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Body & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEINBERG, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On the Embodiment of Addiction

DARIN WEINBERG

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge

In an effort to promote more theoretically incisive research regarding the specifically sociological aspects of addiction, this article critically discusses three prominent theoretical paradigms for the study of addiction - neurology, learning theory and symbolic interaction. Neurological theories and learning theories are found to inadequately provide for the role of culturally transmitted meanings in the addiction process. While symbolic interactionist theories have been centrally concerned with meaning, they have failed to theorize how issues of meaning might figure in the addict's inevitable subjective estrangement from his or her drug-related activities. This stems from their failure to appreciate the reality of non-symbolic meaning, or meaningful experience that manifests pre-reflectively, at the level of our immediate bodily encounter with reality. The article concludes by suggesting that sociological students of addiction adopt a more thoroughly praxiological orientation to meaningful experience, so as to overcome the analytic limitations inherent in the antinomy between biological reductionism and disembodied cognitivism.

Key Words: addiction theory • drug problems • social constructionism • social phenomenology • substance abuse

Body & Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1-19 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X02008004001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health (London)Home page
E. G. Mishler
Patient stories, narratives of resistance and the ethics of humane care: a la recherche du temps perdu
Health (London) , October 1, 2005; 9(4): 431 - 451.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Discourse SocietyHome page
G. Cook and T. Walter
Rewritten rites: language and social relations in traditional and contemporary funerals
Discourse Society, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 365 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
S. E. Bell
Intensive Performances of Mothering: a Sociological Perspective
Qualitative Research, April 1, 2004; 4(1): 45 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]