Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Body & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lock, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortalized Cell Lines

Margaret Lock

Department of Social Studies and Medicine and the Department of Anthropology at McGill University, Montreal.

The alienation of body parts and their transformation into commodities raises questions about ownership, property rights, and about possible violation of the moral order. This article focuses on the `social life' of objects, including body parts, and the multiple meanings attached to them that are made visible in systems of exchange. The transformation of DNA obtained in blood samples into immortalized cell lines for use in the Human Genome Diversity Project is introduced as an illustration of contested commodification. The meanings attached to the blood samples by those from whom they are procured and their worth to the scientists who create the cell lines are of an entirely different order. Disputes about the HGDP that have erupted since it was first planned are presented in detail, followed by a discussion of the ethics of gene prospecting and the associated politics of biocapitalism currently proliferating in the private sector.

Key Words: alienation • biocapitalism • body parts • cell lines • commodification • genetic commerce • Human Genome Project

Body & Society, Vol. 7, No. 2-3, 63-91 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X0100700204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Philosophy Social CriticismHome page
F. Vandenberghe
Deleuzian capitalism
Philosophy Social Criticism, October 1, 2008; 34(8): 877 - 903.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Theory Culture SocietyHome page
S. Franklin
The Cyborg Embryo: Our Path to Transbiology
Theory Culture Society, December 1, 2006; 23(7-8): 167 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Chronic IllnessHome page
M. Dixon-Woods, B. Young, and E. Ross
Researching chronic childhood illness: the example of childhood cancer
Chronic Illness, September 1, 2006; 2(3): 165 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Body SocietyHome page
C. Seale, D. Cavers, and M. Dixon-Woods
Commodification of Body Parts: By Medicine or by Media?
Body Society, March 1, 2006; 12(1): 25 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Feminist TheoryHome page
C. Waldby
Biomedicine, tissue transfer and intercorporeality
Feminist Theory, December 1, 2002; 3(3): 239 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]