Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Body & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MICHAEL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

These Boots Are Made for Walking...: Mundane Technology, the Body and Human-Environment Relations

MIKE MICHAEL

Sociology Department at Goldsmiths College, University of London

This article begins with a consideration of the `pure' unmediated relation between the human body and nature, exemplified, in different ways, by environmental expressivism, and Ingold's subtle analysis of affordance and the taskscape. It is argued that perspectives fail properly to incorporate the role of mundane technology in the mediation of human-nature relations. Drawing upon the work of Michael Serres, and, in particular, his concept of the parasite, I explore how these mundane technological artefacts - specifically, walking boots - intervene in the circuits of communication between humans and the natural environment. This re-orientation traces how the local relation between bodies and environments is a complex movement between the material and semiotic, the local and the global. In the process, I draw upon four aspects of walking boots: first, there is the role of boots as mechanical technologies that can cause pain, dissolving identity and the relation between humans and nature; second, there is the role of boots as signifying style and identity; third, there is the role of boots as embodiments of procedures of standardization and objectification; and fourth, there is the role of boots as technological means of damage to nature. Finally, in concluding, I tentatively consider some of the political implications of this way of theorizing the relation between bodies and environments.

Key Words: complexity • global/local • heterogeneity • nature/culture • parasite

Body & Society, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 107-126 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X00006003006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
G. Downey
Producing Pain: Techniques and Technologies in No-Holds-Barred Fighting
Social Studies of Science, April 1, 2007; 37(2): 201 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
M. Featherstone
Automobilities: An Introduction
Theory Culture Society, October 1, 2004; 21(4-5): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
S. SLAVIN
Walking as Spiritual Practice: The Pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela
Body Society, September 1, 2003; 9(3): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]